Water and Sewage Treatment: Expertise Unlimited

Spent a long day yesterday troubleshooting problems with the duff effluent treatment plant for the pharma client previously discussed. Managed to solve his excessive flow to sewer by simply restricting air flow to his diaphragm pumps. The client had not thought of this because he was convinced that his effluent flow rate was around five times its actual value. Always good to check your assumptions. Couldn't get his pH correction system online, due to problems with an injection lance, but increasing the alum dose brought the pH into spec. anyway. Just the problems with COD, suspended solids and heavy metals to solve now.

Also had a call from the Environment Agency yesterday about a former client who has tried to solve his own problems with an undersized effluent treatment plant. Like a lot of inexpert clients with such problems, he had been duped by a succession of snake-oil salesmen into trying all sorts of quick fixes, none of which had worked. He only carried out the cheaper of my recommendations, as cheaply as possible, and now it seems he is likely to get prosecuted.

The morals are:

1. All the magic bugs, fat dissolvers, swimming-pool filters and chemical dosing in the world will not save you if your plant is not the right size, installed, operated and maintained correctly. If it is correctly designed, installed, operated and maintained, you will not need these things.

2. If you spend money on a consultant, follow his suggestions. Waving a report whose suggestions you did not implement at the EA will not save you from prosecution.

Experiments on PCB containing oily sludges are going OK, in the strict scientific sense. That is, we have no growth yet of either anaerobic or aerobic organisms on the stuff. Of course, from a practical point of view, this disappoints.

Labels: agency, alum, COD, dosing, environment, pH, pharmaceutical, plant, problem, sewage, solids, suspended, treatment, troubleshooting, water

More enquiries have come in from people with misbehaving small effluent treatment plants. I have covered some of the more interesting problems I have encountered previously with small plants on my website here.

Most of the non-compliant effluent treatment plants I see have been undersized, poorly maintained, and often worsened by the attention of unqualified "engineers" from maintenance companies.

From July of this year, BS EN 12566-3 replaces all national standards for sewage treatment plants for up to 50 population equivalent. Trading standards will enforce it, and it will require plants to have been tested to meet a set standard. The plants will therefore deliver a set standard at their rated population equivalent.

I have however only once been called out to a plant which was incapable of meeting its claimed standard by reason of incompetent basic design (that manufacturer shortly afterwards started to offer someone else's design, whilst not admitting that theirs was incapable of performing as claimed). The problem is more commonly poor specification, installation or maintenance.

What we therefore need now if for someone to make the specifier comply with the British Water Code of Practice in setting a conservative population equivalent for their development, and for someone to explain to the monkeys who work for maintenance companies that no amount of sucking sludge into a tanker makes you an engineer, and I'll be out of a job. I'm not losing any sleep about it. You can go to jail for claiming to be a Doctor, but anyone can claim to be an Engineer.

Labels: BS EN 12566-3, effluent, package, plant, sewage, treatment

I've decided to start a blog on the company website, covering things which interest me professionally.

I'm a Chemical Engineer and Environmental Scientist, working mainly in the field of Water Engineering, though I do also deal in more general environmental advice, mostly on behalf of a government funded scheme called Envirowise.

I used to work for water contractors who you will not now have heard of, because it is seemingly a rule in the water industry that companies have to change the name of their company from time to time, for a number of reasons. For good companies, this is usually something to do with the marketing department. For bad companies, the reasons may be less honourable. None of the people I used to work for went bust by bidding jobs at less than cost and then came back one month later as "(old company name) 2008 Limited", but this is far from uncommon in the industry.

I do quite a bit of work of packaged sewage treatment plants which are misbehaving, look after some groundwater treatment plants, and am also presently involved in something I do a bit of from time to time, water feature design. I am helping with the design of water features in the Parc1 development in Korea. Don't click on the link unless you have broadband, the graphic designers have gone nuts on the website.

I'm also interested in water quackery, and will post some stuff on this as I come across new examples.

Labels: chemical, design, effluent, engineer, environment, etp, groundwater, industrial, package, PCB, pharmaceutical, plant, problem, sewage, sludge, treatment, troubleshooting, wastewater